Hitler Became Chancellor in 1933 Because He Was Leader of the Most Popular Party in Germany Essay

Hitler became prime minister in 1933 because he was drager of the nigh general companionship in Ger umpteen. How far you agree with this opinion? Hitlers appointment in 1933 can non be send down to just one itemor. There were many potent occurrences leading up to his appointment but boilersuit the wide belief seems to be the biggest factor as it started a chain reaction that overall led to Hitler being chancellor of Germany. Therefore, despite being the leader of the well-nigh popular troupe in Germany playing a part in Hitlers appointment as prime minister it was non solely prudent and was also not the just nearly important factor.An principle that could be use to show that Hitler became chancellor in 1933 because he was leader of the most popular political party in Germany is the intellect that the Nazis employ effective tactics which not only allowed them to crystalise extreme popularity but also their leader, Adolf Hitler. Essentially, the Nazis clever str ategies allowed Hitler to gain recognition. For example, the Nazis were incredibly good at changing their policies to suit their audiences at rallies. The enceinte Depression was also used to their favour promoting Hitler as the saviour in their propaganda to incredible effect.Goebbels propaganda campaign was very effective and it won domiciliate for the Nazis and Hitler. Also, Hitler locomote away from violence and realised that the only way he could put on true power was with the Reichstag. The Nazis were able to win over the working and middle classes by using their anti-Jewish propaganda for the working classes and for the middle classes and farmers they focussed on their policies on powerless and honourless Germany, fashioning it great again. No other party focussed more on propaganda than the Nazis they were masters of propaganda.Their propaganda skills had the ability to change the universals opinions and views. It encompassed every aspect of Weimar Germany to entice millions of people into following them, their policies ranged from unemployment to the pang in the back myth of Versailles. This increased the appeal of the Nazis and as a result they increased their select in the Reichstag in the next option of July 1932, increasing their number of seats to 230 and becoming the largest party in the Reichstag.The Nazis used the problems with the economy and the Weimar republic to boost their support this is evident in the fact that as unemployment got worse, Nazi support increased. Therefore clearly, being the leader of the most popular party did deliver extreme benefits for Hitler in terms of service of process him sprain Chancellor due to gaining popularity through the party. Having said that, the idea that Hitler became Chancellor in 1933 because he was leader of the most popular party in Germany to an extent can be implored to be untrue as briefly discussed the weaknesses of the Weimar government also played a clear role.More specificall y, events contingency outside of Germany such as Wall Street Crash The Great Depression. Germany suffered the consequences due to the collapse of share harms on the New York Stock sub more than any other country. US loans and investment ceased and demands quickly followed for the repayment of forward short-term loans. Also, the crisis caused a further decline in the price of food and raw materials as the industrialised nations reduced their imports. As demands for exports collapsed conception trade slumped and German industry could no longer pay its way.The argument could therefore be made that without this event the Nazis may not have become the most popular party. After all, the partys popularity came from rage and bitterness of Weimar. Therefore, people turned towards the extremist governmental parties. Yet many workers turned to communism but this f counterbalanceened wealthy businessmen, so they financed Hitlers campaigns. Many middle-class people, alarmed by the obvious failure of democracy, firm that the country necessary a strong government. The depression of 1929 created poverty and unemployment, making people angry with the Weimar government.Overall, this argument clearly signifies that Hitlers appointment to become Chancellor was not just down to him being leader of the most popular party in Germany events outside Germany lead to Weimar failing miserably which also played a clear role. Nazis electoral success in 1932 did to an extent have an impact and therefore, can be used to argue that Hitler became Chancellor in 1933 because he was leader of the most popular party in Germany. After all, the elections to the Reichstag in July saw the Nazi percentage of the vote increase to 37. 3 per cent, making it the largest party in the Reichstag. This was a screaming(prenominal) breakthrough.As the largest political group in the Reichstag, they had a mandate from the German people to be involved in the government. Clearly, this indicates that whilst the Nazi party looked progressively powerful, their leader Hitler did so too making him more well cognize throughout the country. This argument is also strengthened by the thought that it is subsequent on all, down to being the leader of the Nazis because the moderate parties would not work unneurotic despite the fact that together they would be stronger than the Nazis and therefore, weaknesses of other parties contribute to Hitler and the Nazis aspect stronger.This strength made Hitler more established as a political figure giving him a clear advantage. However, in comparison to the previous argument another reason for Hitlers Chancellorship was Von Papen indicating that Hitler did not become Chancellor just due to being the leader of the most popular party in Germany. After all, the Nazis gained electoral success in 1932 but Hindenburg pipe down refused to make Hitler Chancellor indicating despite being the leader this did not put Hitler in an advantageous position. Yet, V on Papen had been Chancellor before Hitler and had become close friends with chairperson Hindenburg.This played much to Hitlers advantage as Papen offered to convince Hindenburg that Hitler was the right choice for the new Chancellor provided Papen could be Vice Chancellor. Von Papen managed to convince Hindenburg, along with various other politicians that Hitler was the best choice. Without Von Papen, Hitler may not have managed to ab initio become Chancellor or at least not until later than January 1933. This combined with the idea that previous governments were weak and lacked support made a clear sign for that Germany needed change. Hitler was something new and had clearly opposed the idea of a democracy from the start.As the German public started to go against the country their support turned to the opposing and completely differing view of Hitler. He was opposite to the past chancellors such as Von Papen who represented failed governments. He portrayed himself through prop aganda and in speeches as a strong and powerful leader who could lead Germany out of this depression and unrest and thats what the German public needed at the time. After all, Hindenburg had no other alternative but to stupefy Hitler as Chancellor due to the failures of previous governments and Hitlers growing support from people close to Hindenburg.Also, other worldly-minded elites believed that Hitler was a man that could considerably be tamed and kept under control. This gave him an advantage over the Communists, as Hindenburg believed he wouldnt be able to control the communists if he back up them. This is therefore important in the eventual appointment of Hitler as Chancellor as without the support of the conservative elites, it is debatable as to whether or not Hitler would actually have gained power. Even, when in the July 1932 the NSDAP won 230 seats, becoming the largest party in Germany,Hindenburg did not appoint Hitler Chancellor. Hence, it is hard to imagine why anyt hing would have changed without great pressure being mounted on Hindenburg from business. In particular, without the support of von Papen and his divinatory ability to control Hitler, Hindenburg would certainly not have been persuaded. Clearly then, these conservative elites had at least some impact in bringing about Hitlers time as Chancellor. Also, the misjudgement of von Papen and Hindenburg in believing that they could control Hitler is life-and-death in explaining the overall Nazi seizure of power.