Eeoc Paper Essay

The purpose of this paper is to go oer a drive that was filled by the linked States adequate art Opportunity Commission. The paper will cover who the EEOC (Equal art Opportunity Commission) is and their parting in the compositors case. It will go over whether or non the typesetters case promotes social change. The paper will also go over how the EEOC as well as other news groups released training round the case to the public. I will then give my pick out on how I would implement new strategies to make sure the paradox does non come up in the workplace again. A explanation of the compliance issue that led to the eccentric The lawsuit that I study chosen is about a lodge not hiring someone because of their race. Tyeastia grand sued Alliant Techsystems, Inc. (ATK) because they did not hire her due to her race. A recruiter for ATK initially told her that she had gotten the job, later ATK spurned her and hired a while male instead (U.S. Equal recitation Opportunity C ommission, 2012).A brief Summary of the functions of the EEOCAccording to U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2012), the EEOC is responsible for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against a job applicant or an employee because of the persons race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or catching information (Aerospace and Defense Manufacturer Rejected Applicant on racial Grounds, Federal Agency Charged). The EEOC investigates charges of inconsistency against employers who atomic number 18 covered by the law. Their role is the fairly and accurately assess the allegations in the charge and make a finding. The EEOC also works to prevent unlikeness before it happens by oblation education and technical assistance programs.The EEOCs role in this lawsuitThe EEOCs role in the lawsuit was to find out whether or not the claim was valid. Once they decided that the claim was valid, they tried to bre ak up the charge in a pre-litigation settlement. Since ATK did not want to settle, the EEOC filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2012). Whether or not this lawsuit promotes social change and reasons I do not view that this lawsuit promotes social change. I believe this because I do not believe that this was a real discrimination due to Tyeastia Greens race. According to Stych (2012), the recruiter asked her to concern out her braids to push through to a greater extent professional.Tyaestia did set out out her braids but later put them behind in before she got hired on. I believe that the company was not trying to discriminate against her. They asked her to do something to look more professional. The company does not sustain the right to tell her how she should wear her hair, but I do not believe they didnt hire her because of her race. I believe that they didnt hire her because she didnt comply with how they thought a profession person should look.A comparison of the EEOC press release to the news itemThe EEOCs press release was not very informational. It did not give ofttimes detail on how the company discriminated against Tyeastia Green. The press release just say that ATK did not hire her because of her race. It also said that the company will relent $100,000 and furnish other relief to settle the race discrimination lawsuit filed by the EEOC (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2012). The article written by Ed Stych for the Minneapolis/ St. capital of Minnesota Business Journal went into more detail on what happened that lead to the lawsuit being filed. The article said that a recruiter asked Tyeastia to take out her braids to look more professional and that they set up an interview with the companys information technology director and asked that she came to that interview the same way, without the braids (Stych, 2012).What accounts for the differences? I think that the reason they are different is because the EEOC has a covert policy where they are not allowed to release certain information about the case. Other news groups on the other hand do not have a privacy policy. They write as much as they retire in their articles. The Business Journal wanted the public to know why the lawsuit was filed and what lead up to the lawsuit. Strategies for ensuring inclusion in multicultural workplace If I was a senior manager at ATK, I would make sure that I specified how I believe the companys image is displayed properly. I would make sure that everyone would be hardened equally. I would make sure that all of the managers make everyone feel at home in the workplace. I would give classes to the managers and the recruiters on how to prevent discrimination in the workplace. I would also make sure that the recruiters learn how to call on the carpet to people without discriminating against them.ConclusionThis paper has gone over the lawsuit tha t was filed by the EEOC. It also went over who the EEOC is and what their role is in the lawsuit. It also went over how the EEOCs press release and the Minneapolis/ St. Paul Business Journal articles different. I have learned that employers need to watch what they say and be more specific on how they say things to people as well. I think that if the recruiter has just explained better on why they did not want her to have her braids, things might have gone a little better. If I was Tyeastia, I would have waited until after my final interview to put the braids back in. They asked her to take them out and she did, then they asked her to come looking just like that to the conflict with the information technology director and she didnt. I think that both parties are at fault in this situation.ReferencesU.S. Equall Employment Opportunity Commission. (2012). Retrieved from http//www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/11-27-12b.cfm Stych, E. (2012). Mineapolis St. Paul Business Journal. Retrie ved from http//www.bizjournals.com/twincities/news/2011/09/29/atk-sued-eeoc-for-racial-discrimination.html