Historical Validity in The Alamo :: essays research papers

Historical Validity in The AlamoIn the 2004 release, by beat Pictures, The Alamo takes a famous story told throughout time and recreates it on the hide once again. This time was it really any better than the other releases? perchance the flashy effects and better film quality could interest you in this movie but the real question is how valid is it. To the average individual this story looks as if they have recreated it perfectly, but to a historian it mogul not look so genuine. Although this movie does depict many things with exacting efficiency some things are left out. Almost completely unattended in this movie are important instances in history such as the cowardly James Fannin and the battle at Goliad. This is an important sort of the story that has been left out. It could have been nice to know what happened to the one mortal who could have helped but refused to due to his own growing situation. Also in the movie James Bowie is portrayed as a mildly disquieted perso n whereas in real life he deathly ill. He was known to have typhoid fever and a bad matter at that. Beyond the fallacies in this movie there were many smashing things that were put to the screen. One of the best in my opinion is the removal of the lineage that was drawn in the dirt by Travis. According to much query the line was actually a story drawn up years later to help signify the sacrifices these hands had made. They correctly portrayed how the men were outnumbered in this fight and the effort and courage that was put forth in this battle to defend the Alamo. The last and most controversial issue in the movie is how did David Crockett really die? In this movie they give him the valorous death that he was thought to have.