Apartheid Sources Question Essay

Part 2 Explain whether any wholeness of the factors in the list was more important than the others.The containing of white nonage rule in South Africa was down to a mixture of each(prenominal) of these points. Without all of these points, the ending of the majority rule might non conduct happened. All of the points form the international isolation all of the way up to the actions of De Klerk contributed to the end of the majority rule. However, if I had to put them into order of importance, I would imagine that Mandelas actions were the most important, closely followed by the actions of De Klerk.Nelson Mandela was the one most regard with the ending of the majority rule, as he has the most links with the variant points. Firstly, Mandela was responsible for the organization of the MK, and for many of the other ANC movements and many other macabre protests. He was an inspiration for many of the protests and riots even when he was in prison. If he hadnt suck in done any of the se things in the first place, thence the government would non chip in imprisoned him, and then he would not have gained the international and political attention that he did while he was in prison.This international and political awareness of the problems in South Africa that Nelson Mandela caused withal brought around the economic sanctions. The sanctions and the vast disinvestments had put South Africas scrimping into considerable trouble, and this is what drove De Klerk to realise that the Apartheid had to be stopped. If he had not earn this, then he would not have come to power in South Africa, and he would not have released Mandela from prison, starting the negotiations that led to the CODESA gurgles.De Klerk was in any case pressured into these actions by the increased violence caused by black protests and riots after Mandelas release. Again, if Mandela had not have been around, the inspiration would not have been there, the MK would not have been set up, and who knows what would have happened.Another link with Mandela is the fact that De Klerk decided to talk to him instead of one of the other black rights leaders around at the time. This is down to the fact that De Klerk saw Mandela as someone he could via media with him, a reasonable man who would see things fairly, and would not solely be out for revenge. If Mandela had not of been perceived like this by De Klerk, then it is viable that De Klerk would have followed the same route as his predecessors had, and he could have good continued with the idea of apartheid, and white minority rule.Therefore, without all of Mandelas actions, De Klerk would not have been as effective in the ending of white minority rule in South Africa, the economic sanctions might not have been used as early as they were, or to such a great extent, and the pressure from the black protests would not have been as hefty as it was.However, along with Mandelas actions, the other factors had to take place themselves, and without these, the end of the white minority rule would not have been reached when it was.