Leadership Study Essay Example for Free

Leadership Study Es positQuestion 1 What is your mentation of Gerrys approach to evaluating the output of the newfangled- harvest development group? While Gerry looks ready for fresh and new product ideas, his approach to evaluating ideas presented by Maria and the new-product development group is harsh and in my opinion put forth as disapproval vice positive reprimand. The team has been working hard and Gerrys comments, I lead off the impression that there is a lot of activity going on here, but it does not inflictm to be foc utilize activity, would groom me defensive and rather than listening to Gerry, Maria is probably reckoning about how to respond to the snide comments and feedback. Gerry could have been more tactful and should have been more supportive when spell down the teams ideas and putting Maria on the defensive. As a result, they are likely to interpret criticism as a personal attack on their self-worth.1 (DuBrin, 2013, p. 362) It would have been better in my opinion to say nothing or use tact in his approach and rather than criticize, he could have used it as a coaching opportunity and turned down Marias idea with constructive feedback.Question 2 Do you designate that Maria is getting too sensitive to criticism? Gerrys comments are not constructive but rather criticism so, no, I dont think Maria is getting too sensitive to Gerrys criticism. Garth Laidlaw pointed out that new-product development is a risky crease and that 90 percent of new-product ideas never make it to the market shelves so Gerry shouldve expected some failures. I think Gerry should have come into the venture using what DuBrin calls a use loose-tight leadership style. Looseness refers to granting space for new ideas and exploration, whereas a tight approach means finally making a choice among the alternatives.2 (DuBrin, 2013, p. 365) Innovation is too enhanced when workers throughout the organization are able to purse absurd ideas without penalty for being tre at or for having wasted some resources.3 (DuBrin, 2013, p. 365)Question 3 How do constraints on imaginative thinking enter into this suit? Gerry is not practicing transformational leadership and fostering an environment for change and innovation. The executive office sees a need for innovation, establishes a team and even places the team away from the corporate flag but I didnt see Gerry having a clear vision orproviding any type of guidance on the types of goods or celestial sphere that the new product development group should focusing their talents. Information about establishing a climate for creativity can be divided into (1) leadership and managerial practices for enhancing creativity and (2) methods for managing creative workers.4 (DuBrin, 2013, p. 357) Gerry wants innovation and creativity, provided resources but his stiff leadership style would hinder creativity in any organization. One should provide excellent tools and resources, conk out creative people flexibility, t urn down ideas gently, and employ creative people to manage and evaluate creative workers.5 (DuBrin, 2013, p. 366) The company seems focused on innovation for its own sake without a clear goal in mind, and Gerry is quick to criticize the ideas presented by the innovation team rather than recognizing opportunities in lemons. It takes a lot of lemons to make lemonade.