British Television Essay Example for Free

British Television EssaySoap opera house is the almost popular genre of boob tube programming across the globe and has been the leading favourite of British television for the past forty-six years. The trend evolved from the radio ooze operas of the 1930s and 1940s, surfacing first in the join States and later spreading across the world. It attracted large auditions consisting in the first place of female listeners and with the growing popularity of television it soon became hard rooted on the screen.The long running Coronation Street was the first British goo opera to make a signifi buttt impact on UK drama in 1960s. Its aim was to target mainly working class people in creating a microcosm of the working world we live in, focusing on realism as opposed to the escapism forms of the American scoop shovels. In order to conclude on whether the confidence of this genre is beneficial or detrimental to the future welfare of British drama, Im going to study the pros and cons of exclusive opera as a form of British Television.Over the years soap operas be possessed of been infinitely praised and condemned by the general public and despite of its popularity the genre continues to carry the connotation of a degraded hea whence form of television drama. There is the common belief that soap operas are for those with simple tastes and limited capacities, for the electrical capacity and style of them are unable to truly challenge the viewers in the same itinerary that the more than(prenominal)(prenominal) serious single drama can. However, it is a known fact that soap opera is the most complicated narrative form of all television drama requiring prior knowledge from its sense of hearing.David Buckingham (Public Secrets EastEnders and its Audience) mentions the mental demands that soap operas request from a viewer focusing on the ability to recall past events when cued, to olfaction into the future and think over about forth coming events and t o use the multi-plot narrative for lateral reference. Hence although the content whitethorn not be truly ambitious it would be wrong to say that soap operas require nothing from their audiences for it is a general assumption that the average viewer is a fan of the show.Yet, it has been labelled as little more than chewing gum for the eyes (Richard Kilborn in Television Soaps), a harmful and corrupting product of publicise that feeds the soap viewers addictions with the so-called mindless forms of entertainment they offer. Issues of influence over audience and the affects that the content may have on its viewers cause much controversy. There is the belief that as an active audience we are in control and therefore choose whether we watch something more challenging or something that we can watch unfold in front of us, no questions required.For this reason we also have the ability to nail whats real and what isnt, and yet, we have the concern of cultivation variantial, where the vi ewer begins to accept the values portrayed in the soap operas as their own, or more so than the values of the world we live in. We must ask ourselves then whether soap operas are an accurate portrait of life today and with regards to this, how harmful can the programmes be if the audience begins to take the soaps values as their own?British soaps are watched for their realism having become our virtual communities, doing more to break down social and class boundaries than any government leader could ever do (Mal Young, BBC Televisions wit of drama series). They cover a diverse range of issues, in particular domestic, from storylines of health, relationships, business and family, to the ever so popular murder and death. Based, for the most part, on problems experienced within personal relationships and family life the content of the soap is fundamentally humanised, and thus we find the lifestyles led on screen are not so different from our own.They attempt to represent the realities of a working class life and confront umteen of the problems faced in our society, exploring all the different possibilities and affects of such struggles but never claiming to offer a single solution. The realism of these soaps is emphasise more so by the reasonably slow pace at which the narrative is allowed to progress appear more or less to be unravelling in real time. Viewers can often get word with the stereotype characters of the drama series that become almost existent to them.However, there are much large dramas in our world than domestic murder and by resorting to melodrama its as if we are choosing a more impregnable and cosy view of society. So, should our soap operas be more demanding of their audiences, and should they be tackling greater issues becoming more analogous the golden ages of television when the programmes were revolutionary, making an impact on the viewers? I would argue that times have changed and soap operas, whether focusing on realism or glamorou s escapism, are a form of painless therapy for viewers to turn to, becoming a part of that world and forgetting theirs.It is in single drama that we look to be challenged and if soaps began to address the more serious issues, encouraging us to question and think then I feel the need for single drama would soon disappear. Its not so much the form or content of soap operas that may be detrimental to future welfare of British drama, but the way is dominates our television schedules. The real danger is that other forms of drama with perhaps more important/ meaningful messages may be overlooked and that is where we may lose revolutionary television.Its alarming how many another(prenominal) hours of soaps and docu-soaps (reality programmes) are choking up vast swathes of airtime like pondweed (Adam Sweeting Soap Springs Eternal Guardian website). The former values of Lord Reith take care almost non-existent, for the once precious airtime to show variety is now seen as a mere dickhead for audience shares. The domination of this phenomenon has led television companies to believe that the somewhat cheap and open ended formats of soap operas are a much safer option than striving to make new original programmes with a challenging voice.The soaps do what they do well, but that doesnt mean that should be the only form of drama on T. V, or that they should be the only sources of good, interesting actors (Christine Geraghty ). Soap operas are beneficial in that they tackle the smaller issues in our society leaving room for other forms of drama to make greater impacts with more challenging storylines, confronting the greater political issues like terrorism and racism. The fact that soap operas are continuous and avoid narrative cylinder block would make it more difficult, I believe, to create a strong drama series about a deeply serious and ongoing issue.They are good at showing the domestic issues that many showdown and should rest at that. What is destructive to the w elfare of British drama is that television companies are now avoiding more challenging storylines and forms of drama with the fear that they will lose money. Soap operas can easily recover but a single drama either works or flops. I feel that a chemical equilibrium is needed in that we have our intake of soap operas but there are so many crowding our television airtime that any more would be a waste and hinder other forms of more serious drama.I find myself also questioning the continuity of its popularity, for if there are too many soap operas then we see the same issues occurring again and again. The interest may soon die as we seek for more challenging material and thus, the necessity for a balance is vital, in having airtime for escaping into another world, possible or not, without having to think to much, and having time for the more serious programmes where we are left questioning.